Chicken Pho (Phở Gà)

Love Phở  – shame I can’t cook – but just might try this.

It's More Than Just Pho

The time has come…I made pho!!

And can I just clarify to all: it’s is pronounced like “fuh,” not “foe.”  It drives me nuts when people say it wrong!

Also, I don’t use MSG.  For some reason, a lot of my friends asked me this when I told them I was making pho.  Pho restaurants typically use MSG to enhance the flavor of soup, but I am not a pho restaurant so I use good old sugar and fish sauce.

I had many requests from friends to make this, so I felt that it was high time I shared my version of the popular noodle soup.  Many of you may be accustomed to beef pho, but I personally prefer to make it with chicken.  I think it’s just because I like chicken better than beef in general.  You can totally substitute the chicken stock with beef stock; the pork bones with…

View original post 425 more words

Social workers – fair game for a good old bash?

Social work bashing starts whenever something goes wrong and it’s been getting out of hand lately. Social workers get bad press – fair game for anyone ideologically opposed to welfare, looking for blood, or who think they have simple answers to complex, messy problems. Social workers often can’t defend themselves because they work for public institutions and are certainly not going to break confidentiality anyway. But there’s another issue here too. Why do some people insist on calling anyone involved in welfare a social worker? Many countries legislate to protect the title of social worker. That means no one can use it except qualified social workers – in other words – .someone who actually has a social work degree (bachelor or masters) and is eligible for memberships of social work professional associations. Many countries including Australia do not have legal protection over the title but it doesn’t change anything – check your facts – you just can’t go around calling someone a doctor or lawyer if they don’t have the qualifications. Social work is no different. So get with it journos, politicians and everyone else who bandies the title around in a willy nilly fashion. If you read about a ‘social worker” don’t assume they are. Let’s take child protection workers as an example. Child protection workers have a wide range of qualifications and could be be qualified in social science or human services, or psychology, teaching, criminology or even nursing. Some even have a police background – nothing wrong with these professions – just be accurate and call it like it is. Don’t get me wrong they shouldn’t be bashed either – just get the facts right. Even better let’s try some critical thinking not the blame game. Fair criticism accepted.